When the general public thinks of the word “cybersecurity,” what typically comes to mind is personal data theft.
Some bad actor may steal your financial information. Some hacker will gain illegal access to your computer files. On a larger scale, someone may steal customer information from a corporate database.
Of course, such breaches can cause large-scale damage to both companies and individuals.
But now the rules have changed.
The game has evolved.
The horizon has expanded,
The conflict gaining an exponential boost as the Internet-of-Things (IoT)--where every device in your home or within an infrastructure becomes connected online--enters mainstream adoption.
Now, it’s not just the individual or the corporation to fall victim to a cyber attack.
Internet itself can be disrupted.
Meaning that entire countries can be taken offline.
Lights can be cut off. Water supplies can be halted. Temperature sensors can be manipulated to cause factories to blow up or ignite from within.
Cyber attacks are the new Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs). And once it happens, it can take months if at all to identify who the attacker might be.
Just a few days ago, Britain’s second busiest airport, Gatwick Airport, was brought to a halt for two days.
What caused the standstill? A single drone. Not a cyber attack, but a relatively small flying gadget.
Imagine what a sophisticated online attack might have done. Most people would rest assured that cybersecurity experts would never let such an attack take place.
But evolution in this realm sees no difference between progress and its malevolence: the more sophisticated the cybersecurity, the more sophisticated the attack.
It’s a feedback loop of escalation. Endpoint none.
Does this sound like a narrative premise to an old latest cyberpunk novel? In a way, it does. But that’s because most people haven’t yet resigned to the fact that such destruction is not only possible...it’s highly probable...it has already happened....and it will continue to happen.
It has a history that has been building up with greater frequency.
At this juncture, it’s important to note that the last two attacks mentioned were handled by relatively “unsophisticated” bad actors.
The main point here is that there is not “one” bad actor attempting to take countries offline. There are many bad actors: lone hackers, organized collectives, terrorists, and rival countries.
So what might happen if the electronic or digital financial infrastructure were to be taken offline?
What if, similar to what happened to Puerto Rico after Hurricanes Irma and Maria struck, you weren’t able to access ATM machines for cash, or digital money?
What other physical forms of money might you have? Cash is limited. Digitized money or cryptocurrency would be useless (since you can’t access them). Your stock holdings would be meaningless.
What about gold and silver? What if someone willing to make a transaction with you were to offer silver or gold coin or bullion?
Most people in their right minds would take it. As both gold and silver are not only legitimate forms of money but the safest forms of money that you can privately store and use in cases such as this one.
New York City’s latest plan to fix “food deserts” sounds simple: build government-owned grocery stores…
Something bigger is unfolding beneath the headlines—and most people aren’t connecting the dots yet. A…
Washington keeps selling Americans the same tired lie: that endless wars and economic crackdowns will…
The IRS isn’t collapsing under its own weight—it’s suffocating under a tax code Congress intentionally…
Wall Street just admitted something most investors were never supposed to question: your money may…
The IMF just issued a warning about U.S. debt that most people will never see—but…
This website uses cookies.
Read More