Children of the Algorithm: How the Left Engineered a Generation to Cheer for Blood

The Bloodlust Is Real: Charlie Kirk’s Murder Was the Wake-Up Call

In 1975, the Baader-Meinhof gang—a cocktail of Marxism, daddy issues, and dynamite—stormed the West German Embassy and torched it with people inside. Their justification? Revolution, baby. But the real question came from a tabloid headline that didn’t mince words: “So, Who’s Sick?”

Fast-forward 50 years and Charlie Kirk—a loudmouth conservative who, love him or hate him, was engaged in peaceful debate—is murdered on a college campus. And the response? Cheers. Not silence. Not condemnation. Cheers.

The sickness isn’t confined to the perpetrator. It’s systemic. It’s cultural. Hell, it’s strategic. And if you think this is just Gen Z being “edgy,” I’ve got a stack of diversity training manuals that say otherwise.

Manufactured Hatred Isn’t a Bug — It’s the System

When Mao launched the Cultural Revolution, he didn’t just want to purge the “old ways.” He weaponized kids. Got them to denounce their parents, beat their teachers, burn the libraries. Why? Because nothing destabilizes a society faster than turning the youth into ideological vigilantes.

Sound familiar?

From DEI re-education camps in Fortune 500 companies to taxpayer-funded “anti-racism” seminars in elementary schools, the West has undergone its own Cultural Revolution—digitized, sanitized, and livestreamed for maximum dopamine hits. And behind all the jargon—intersectionality, critical theory, “lived experience”—is the same core operating system: engineered resentment.

What’s being taught isn’t knowledge. It’s grievance. Identity over merit. Group guilt over individual responsibility. And most importantly, permanent warfare over peaceful resolution.

Academia: From Ivory Tower to Psychological Warfare Lab

You think it’s coincidence that today’s radicals use the same language—“oppressor,” “liberation,” “praxis”—as the Weather Underground or the Baader-Meinhof crew? It’s not. Those bomb-throwers didn’t disappear. They put on tweed jackets, got tenure, and rewrote the syllabus.

Critical theory didn’t stay in grad school seminars. It metastasized into every HR department, every government grant application, every “inclusive” curriculum. Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe made it explicit: their job wasn’t to resolve conflict. It was to create more. A perpetual factory of outrage, where every social interaction is a potential microaggression and every disagreement is literal violence.

Because in perpetual crisis, there’s always room for another rule, another policy, another bureaucrat to enforce it. And if you resist? Well, now you’re a fascist. That’s the game.

Big Tech: The New Red Guard

And what academia started, the algorithm perfected.

Your kid didn’t wake up one day wanting to castrate the Constitution. It started with TikTok dance videos. Then came the gender pronouns, the Marxist memes, the 30-second hate sessions against “colonizers” and “capitalists.” All curated by an algorithm that rewards moral hysteria and punishes nuance.

This isn’t just digital attention-seeking. It’s Mao’s Little Red Book rewritten as a For You Page. Hashtags instead of helmets, but the effect’s the same.

We’re not raising citizens anymore. We’re cultivating mobs—feral, fragmented, and foaming for a cause. And they’ve been trained to see disagreement not as part of a free society, but as heresy. To mock, dox, cancel—and now, to cheer for murder.

Elites Feed the Fire Because It Keeps Us Distracted

While we’re tearing each other apart online, who benefits?

Not the working class. Not the kid drowning in student debt. Not the family who can’t afford groceries. No, the only ones who win are the managerial elites: the university chancellors, the DEI consultants, the bureaucrats, and the state-backed censors. The more we hate each other, the more we beg for “regulation.” And who provides it? The same people who lit the fire.

A divided society is easy to control. And if the algorithm fails, they’ve got a backup plan—digital currency, biometric surveillance, FedNow. Welcome to your velvet cage.

We Were Warned — And We Didn’t Listen

Allan Bloom told us in The Closing of the American Mind that the universities were committing suicide. David Horowitz, a former radical himself, saw it all coming and called it what it was: not a struggle for justice, but a war on reality.

But we were too polite, too distracted, too busy playing by rules the other side already burned.

Final Word: The Real Question Isn’t “Who’s Sick?” — It’s “What Are You Going to Do About It?”

You’ve seen the signs. You’ve felt the tension. You’ve watched people justify bloodshed with hashtags and HR speak. Don’t be the next casualty of the Culture War 2.0. This is psychological occupation—and it’s time to resist.

You want to survive the collapse? You want to escape the coming financial stranglehold and digital tyranny?

Then start by reclaiming your independence—your mind, your money, your life.

Download “Seven Steps to Protect Yourself from Bank Failure” by Bill Brocius now.
👉 Click here to get the guide

Because when the collapse comes, no one’s coming to save you.
And the mob won’t care what side you were on.

Derek Wolfe out.