a rate inflation

Inflation Heats Up, Fed's Tightrope Walk Gets Trickier


January’s inflation numbers, courtesy of the PCE price index, delivered a cold shower to economic optimists, showing a spike that outstripped forecasts. The data, a critical measure for the Fed, indicated not just a monthly uptick but a year-over-year surge, stoking fears that the Fed’s two-year streak of tightening might still not be enough to tame the inflation beast. Economists, caught off-guard, warn against reading too much into one month’s data, yet the persistent inflationary pressure complicates the Fed’s path to its 2% target. Amidst this backdrop, talks of rate cuts seem optimistic, with the Fed’s balancing act between stimulating growth and controlling inflation becoming ever more precarious. The ripple effects were immediate, nudging Treasury yields up and stirring the financial markets, as gold surged and the dollar strengthened, underscoring the volatile interplay between policy expectations and economic realities.

There were three primary takeaways from today’s PCE price index report.

  • The Commerce Department released the data from the January inflation numbers vis-à-vis the personal consumption expenditures price index, the preferred inflation gauge of the Federal Reserve, revealed inflation growth was much hotter than expected.
  • Some economists including Mark Zendi believe that if the Fed maintains its restrictive stance and tight economic policy, it would result in increasing the danger to economic expansion.
  • Today’s report revealed that the forecast of a 0.4% monthly gain and a 2.4% year-over-year move came in close to answers from a survey of economists from Dow Jones.

Today’s release of the inflationary data provided by the PCE price index for January brought about a heightened concern when compared to previous reports. This was because many economic predictions indicated that inflation would come in much hotter than originally expected. The primary concern was that the report would reveal that inflation in January would show that the cost-of-living is still well above the Fed’s target of 2%. An increase from the previous month could be interpreted as a lack of progress, despite the Fed’s restrictive monetary policy for the last two years.

The core PCE price index is the preferred method of inflationary data by the Federal Reserve because it strips out the more volatile costs of both food and energy. Multiple economists had dire warnings including Zendi, chief economist at Moody’s analytics who said, “Inflation doesn’t move in a straight line. It zigs and it zags, and it zagged in January.” Zendi and other economists expected that the PCE price index would reveal a 0.4% increase in both the headline and core numbers' month over month.

The expectations were that the core PCE data would reveal that inflation had doubled on a month-over-month basis when compared to December. However, many economists have underscored the need to not put too much emphasis on a single month’s data because regardless of the numbers that were revealed today unquestionably inflation has been decelerating, and the Fed is moving closer to its 2% target.

Susan Collins, the Boston Fed president agreed with that assumption saying that, “Expecting all data to speak uniformly is too high a bar.” She added that, “Still, it will be important to see sustained, broadening signs of progress toward the Fed’s dual mandate goals – while recognizing that progress may be uneven.”

Collins is still under the assumption that there are high expectations that the Fed will cut rates this year however the process and timeline will be based on a “methodical,

forward-looking” manner and to happen “gradually,” and not use an aggressive pace of cuts which was the protocol previously.



The net result of today’s numbers increased the yields on the 10-year Treasury notes by nearly ¼ percent, while the 10-year tips rate increased by more than ¼%.

There are two primary inflation reports, the CPI and the PCE. The latter tends to acquire a significant focus under the assumption that the PCE is considered a much broader measure that also considers differentials in consumer behavior which is different from the CPI which is laser-focused on costs rather than just focusing on a static set of goods and services.

In addition to higher numbers than expected in the PCE, both the producer price index and CPI rose to a greater extent than expected in January, which was a component that factored into the computations of the PCE price index.

Major stock indices showed gains across the board. Concurrently, gold had a significant gain with oil, 10-year debt instruments, the US dollar, and the Vix moving lower immediately after the release of today’s report.


As of 5:46 PM ET gold futures basis the most active April contract rose significantly gaining $12 or 0.59% fixing April gold at $2054.70. Gains in gold were not stifled by dollar strength which gained 0.19% fixing the dollar index at 104.10. Lastly, silver futures which had been steadily declining over the last seven trading days had a moderate recovery of 1.1% taking the most active March contract to $22.88.

This article originally appeared on Kitco News

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

sign up for the newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.

7 steps - Lead Gen