create an image of a national guardsmen protecting a casket in front of an angry crowd

Political Violence Isn’t Justice—It’s Collapse: What the Charlie Kirk Fallout Says About America's Fragile Future

EDITOR'S NOTES

A man is dead. A nation is divided. And far too many seem eager to cheer it on from the sidelines. The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has not only revealed a horrifying breakdown in civil discourse—it’s exposed just how close we are to something far worse: political violence becoming the new normal in America.

In the days following Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University, reports have emerged of dozens of professionals—pilots, professors, teachers, even a Secret Service agent—being fired or suspended for comments made about the event on social media. Some celebrated Kirk’s death openly. Others cloaked their contempt in smug euphemisms like “karma” or “you reap what you sow.”

Let’s be clear: you don’t have to agree with Charlie Kirk. You don’t have to like him. You don’t even have to respect his ideas. But if we’ve reached a point where we celebrate an assassination because we dislike someone’s political opinions, then we’ve crossed a line that the Founding Fathers warned us never to approach.

Democracy Requires Tension—Not Violence

The American experiment was never designed to be comfortable. The founders didn’t create a system where everyone agrees—they created one where disagreement was expected, inevitable, and even productive when guided by the principles of free speech and open debate.

Discourse and dissent are the bedrock of democracy. But when we allow our political enemies to be dehumanized, cheered at in death, and silenced even posthumously by mob pressure, we abandon the republic entirely. We trade constitutional order for tribalism—and eventually, for bloodshed.

It doesn’t matter if the person silenced is a hardline conservative or a progressive firebrand. Once the cultural and political climate begins punishing speech—even distasteful speech—through job loss, cancellation, or mob retaliation, the precedent is set. And history tells us that this path never ends well.

The Dangers of Weaponizing Employment - A Libertarian Perspective

According to several media sources, more than 30 individuals have already been disciplined or terminated for social media posts related to Kirk’s assassination. Some mocked him, others celebrated the act outright. In response, employers rushed to fire and suspend people—teachers, deans, pilots, data analysts—often under pressure from social media campaigns and coordinated reporting.

Can we draw a fine line between justice and a new form of political purging? (This is not a rhetorical question.) Could it be argued that in a truly free society, vile speech is countered by better speech—not by coercion?

Let’s not forget: both the Left and the Right are playing this game. What we’re seeing is not a healthy society—it’s a cold civil war fought with digital pitchforks and economic reprisals.

We Must Reject Political Violence—No Matter the Target

Let’s not sugarcoat what happened. A 31-year-old man was gunned down in public for his political views. That’s not “justice.” That’s a political assassination. It should send a chill down the spine of every American, regardless of party affiliation.

If you're cheering that on—or defending those who do—ask yourself: what happens when it's your side next?

Political violence is a Pandora’s box. Open it, and the cycle never ends. What begins with the death of a commentator can end in the death of a republic. That’s the hard truth the media won’t say out loud—but we must.

The Real Enemy: Centralized Control and Manufactured Division

While the public tears itself apart online, the real power players—the bankers, the bureaucrats, the surveillance state—tighten their grip behind the scenes. The more divided we are, the more dependent we become. On their institutions. On their fiat. On their censorship.

And when violence erupts—whether it's in a lecture hall or on a sidewalk—the state has its excuse to crack down even harder. More surveillance. More “domestic terrorism” laws. More censorship of “extremist” speech. And fewer rights for everyone.

The real threat to America isn’t Charlie Kirk or his critics—it’s the rising tide of authoritarianism that thrives on fear and division.

Where Do We Go From Here?

It’s time for Americans—left, right, and independent—to stop wishing death on each other over political differences. It’s time to rediscover the hard, often uncomfortable discipline of free speech, civil debate, and constitutional governance.

Because once political violence becomes normalized, there is no going back.

And once dissent is punished economically, the line between democracy and dictatorship becomes paper-thin.

If you're looking for ways to stay informed, stay independent, and protect your financial future in the face of rising chaos, I urge you to take action now:

The future is uncertain. The institutions are unstable. But your independence doesn’t have to be.

Stay free. Stay sharp.

Eric Blair, Dedollarize News