The Legal Trap: How Courts Are Sabotaging Trump’s Mass Deportation Plan
Biden’s Open Border Legacy: 8 to 10 Million Illegals and Counting
The facts are grim. During Biden’s reign, the U.S. southern border was left wide open. Conservative estimates suggest at least 8 million illegal aliens entered the country—others put the number closer to 10 million or more. While some may have crossed seeking economic opportunity, the rest include criminals, cartel enforcers, rapists, traffickers, terrorists, and foreign agents. This wasn’t immigration—it was infiltration.
Biden dismantled the most effective Trump-era policy—“Remain in Mexico”—and replaced it with a charade of court dates scheduled years in advance. Everyone knew those court notices would be tossed in the trash. There was never any serious intent to enforce the law.
Trump Prioritizes the Worst of the Worst
Despite these setbacks, Trump isn’t backing down. His new mass deportation strategy begins where it must—with the most dangerous. The early focus is on criminals, terrorists, and repeat offenders. Not only does this make communities safer, it gives Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) room to sharpen their tactics for the enormous task ahead.
But the problem isn’t just logistical anymore. It’s judicial.
Rogue Judges: The New Wall Against Enforcement
Trump’s fiercest obstacle now isn’t Biden, the media, or even the illegal aliens themselves. It’s the activist federal court system—especially district judges handpicked by Biden and Obama. These judges don’t act alone. Their dockets are flooded with cases from NGO-backed attorneys, funded by the usual suspects—Soros-linked outfits, left-wing nonprofits, and globalist networks.
Make no mistake: this isn’t about protecting rights. These cases are hand-crafted to kneecap any serious attempt at enforcement. The plaintiffs are just pawns in a legal war designed to stall, confuse, and ultimately block every attempt to restore the rule of law.
The Left’s Strategy: Delay, Delay, Delay
Here’s how the trap works: illegals are coached to claim asylum, cite pending immigration cases, or marry legal residents. Each of these claims is designed to expand their legal status and trigger additional “rights”—due process, habeas corpus, and more—even if they never had full constitutional protections to begin with.
Alejandro Mayorkas knew exactly what he was doing. By turning illegal crossings into legally protected statuses, he’s made mass deportation nearly impossible without a courtroom fight for each individual.
And that’s the playbook: force the Trump administration to litigate millions of cases one-by-one. No mass deportations. No international agreements for offloading illegals. Just legal warfare at maximum volume.
Legal Chaos by Design
This isn’t just about immigrants. This tactic—mass litigation and court gridlock—is designed to be a universal weapon against Trump’s broader agenda. Want to close a rogue federal agency? Expect a dozen lawsuits. Want to fire entrenched bureaucrats? You’ll be buried in injunctions. Want to slash spending? See you in court—for years.
This is the next-gen warfare of the administrative state. Don't just resist Trump. Paralyze him. Not by winning on policy, but by drowning the system in endless lawsuits, one district court at a time.
Even Legal Wins Aren’t Enough
Think Trump can win a few of these cases and push forward? Think again. For every win, the activist class simply files a new case in a new district with slightly different facts. It’s legal whack-a-mole, and it won’t stop until the courts themselves are reined in.
Three Solutions That Can Break the Legal Siege
There are three ways out of this.
- Limit the Courts' Power:
The Supreme Court must issue a ruling that bars district courts from issuing nationwide injunctions. Their rulings should apply only to the plaintiffs—not to entire classes of illegals. Additionally, courts must be reminded they have no constitutional authority over foreign policy, including deportation agreements. - Override the Courts:
Trump should proceed with deportations and ignore judicial overreach when necessary. Critics will cry “unconstitutional,” but it’s more unconstitutional for judges to usurp executive powers clearly delegated to the presidency. If the courts want to act like tyrants, they should expect resistance. - Dismantle the District Courts:
Yes, abolish them—or at least strip authority from those abusing their power. Congress created the lower courts. Congress can restructure or eliminate them. This is not extreme. It’s the lawful use of legislative power to stop judicial tyranny.
One Vote Away from Restoring Order
Right now, Trump has four solid votes at the Supreme Court: Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. He only needs one more—either Barrett or Roberts—to solidify his agenda and crush the legal insurgency against national sovereignty.
If we don’t act, the left wins. And if they win, the republic dies a little more each day. Download our urgent guide, 7 Steps to Protect Your Account from Bank Failure, and fortify yourself against the chaos that’s coming.
For deeper political warfare analysis and actionable strategies, join Bill Brocius’ Inner Circle Newsletter for just $19.95/month.
And if you haven’t read End of Banking As You Know It, it’s time. The war on sovereignty isn’t coming—it’s here.
