Trump’s Economic Policies: A Free-Market Perspective on the Promises and Pitfalls

The U.S. economy, at its core, thrives on the ingenuity and hard work of millions of individuals freely exchanging goods and services. But federal policies—on fiscal spending, regulation, foreign affairs, and monetary management—can act as both catalysts and roadblocks to this prosperity. The late Adam Smith captured this fundamental truth in 1776, and free-market champions like Ludwig von Mises and Murray Rothbard have since echoed it: economic freedom, unhampered by government intervention, is the engine of growth.

As former President Donald Trump pitches his economic vision for a second term, the debate over his policies demands a closer look. Will they unleash market potential or deepen distortions? Let’s examine the good, the bad, and the uncertain aspects of Trump’s economic agenda.

The Good: Tax Cuts and Deregulation—Fuel for the Free Market

Tax Cuts
Few policies align as closely with free-market economics as tax cuts. By allowing individuals and businesses to keep more of their earnings, tax cuts encourage spending, saving, and investment—each of which drives productivity, innovation, and higher living standards.

Trump’s plan to extend the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered individual tax rates and doubled the standard deduction, would preserve these benefits. His proposals to reduce corporate taxes to 15%, eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits, and exempt overtime and tipped income from taxation would further free up capital for growth and incentivize hard work. These are moves in the right direction for anyone concerned with wealth creation and economic vitality.

Deregulation
Equally important is the removal of bureaucratic red tape that stifles entrepreneurship. Trump’s pledge to roll back regulations—especially in the energy sector—would enhance domestic production, lower costs, and reduce U.S. reliance on unstable foreign markets for energy. Deregulation clears the path for innovation, lowers production costs, and creates jobs. In this respect, Trump’s vision aligns with sound economic principles.

The Bad: Spending Sprees and Protectionism—Distorting the Market

Higher Spending
While Trump talks a good game about cutting wasteful government spending, his record and proposals tell a different story. He has called for massive infrastructure spending, which often results in waste, corruption, and market distortions. Government-directed infrastructure projects funnel money to politically connected contractors, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill while misallocating resources that could have been used more efficiently in the private sector.

Trump’s suggestion to appoint Elon Musk as “Secretary of Cost-Cutting” is interesting, but given Trump’s promises to leave entitlements like Social Security and Medicare untouched, as well as his reluctance to reduce defense spending, the scope for meaningful cuts is slim. The bulk of federal spending lies in these politically untouchable programs, making any real fiscal reform unlikely.

Tariffs and Protectionism
One of Trump’s most troubling economic policies is his enthusiasm for tariffs. Tariffs are essentially taxes on American consumers, who bear the brunt of higher prices for imported goods. Trump’s proposal to impose tariffs of 10–20% on all imports and up to 100% on Chinese goods would escalate costs for everyday Americans and disrupt supply chains. Economists from David Ricardo onward have shown that protectionism doesn’t save jobs; it destroys them by making economies less efficient and less competitive.

Even worse, Trump has floated extreme measures like a 25% tariff on all Mexican imports unless Mexico curbs illegal immigration. These policies not only hurt American consumers but also strain diplomatic relationships and risk retaliatory measures from trading partners.

The Uncertain: Monetary Policy, Foreign Affairs, and Immigration

Federal Reserve Independence
Trump and his running mate, Vice President J.D. Vance, have suggested reining in the Federal Reserve’s independence. On one hand, this could be a positive development if it means holding the Fed accountable for its inflationary monetary policies. On the other, if Trump aims to pressure the Fed into lowering interest rates to spur short-term economic growth, the result could be disastrous: higher inflation, another boom-bust cycle, and a further erosion of the dollar’s purchasing power.

True monetary reform would mean eliminating the Fed’s power to manipulate interest rates and ending its monopoly over the money supply. But unless Trump champions these bold changes, his rhetoric on the Fed remains a double-edged sword.

Foreign Policy and War
Trump’s foreign policy record includes one noteworthy achievement: he avoided launching any major new wars during his first term, a rarity among modern presidents. His stated desire to end the costly and dangerous proxy war in Ukraine is commendable, given the staggering toll of over one million lives and $175 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds. However, his hardline stance on China and ambiguous plans for the Middle East leave his broader foreign policy unclear.

Immigration
The U.S. economy benefits from immigrants who contribute to growth and innovation, but it suffers when welfare systems are abused or crime increases. Trump’s immigration stance remains divisive. While he has focused on reducing illegal immigration, it’s unclear whether his policies will attract the peaceful, hard-working individuals the economy needs while deterring those who pose economic and security risks.

The Looming Shadow of the Boom-Bust Cycle

Even with the best economic policies, Trump—or any president—faces an uphill battle against the fallout from the Federal Reserve’s past actions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed increased the money supply by 40%, leading to the highest inflation in decades and a series of aggressive interest rate hikes. These actions have already inverted the yield curve—the most reliable recession predictor—and created a perfect storm of economic warning signs: rising unemployment, declining housing starts, and plunging economic indicators.

If the Fed cuts rates to stave off a recession, the result could be a return to “stagflation”—simultaneously high inflation and low growth—which ravages living standards and erodes savings. This is the economic minefield Trump would inherit, regardless of his intentions.

Conclusion: Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst

Trump’s economic policies present a mixed bag. His commitment to tax cuts and deregulation aligns with free-market principles and offers hope for economic revitalization. But his spending proposals and protectionist trade policies threaten to undermine those gains.

More concerning is the economic backdrop: years of Fed mismanagement have left the U.S. economy teetering on the edge of recession and facing the specter of stagflation. Even the best-intentioned policies will struggle to overcome these structural challenges.

As individuals, we cannot afford to rely on Washington to solve these problems. Protect your financial future now.

• Download Bill Brocius’ free ebook: Seven Steps to Protect Yourself from Bank Failure.
• Join Bill’s Inner Circle Newsletter for $19.95/month to stay ahead of economic turmoil.

In uncertain times, self-reliance and preparation are your best defenses. Don’t wait—secure your wealth and your future today.