Digital,Brain,With,Circuit,And,Ai,Cocept.,3d,Rendering.

🚨 EXPOSED: The AI Agenda—How Leftist Propaganda Hijacked Your Chatbot 🚨

EDITOR'S NOTES

This ain’t your granddaddy’s internet anymore. What started as a helpful tool to explain math homework and demystify legalese has morphed into a mouthpiece for the globalist elite. AI, the darling of Silicon Valley, is now being used to shove green pipe dreams and Marxist dogma down your throat—wrapped in the innocent glow of “objectivity.” But I’m here to rip the mask off. The bots are biased. The system is rigged. And yes, Big Tech is doing the bidding of the Davos crowd.

Sam Clemons May 2, 25

From Magic to Manipulation

AI can do wonders. Let’s give the devil his due.

It broke down complex investing ideas better than any overpaid Wall Street analyst.
It explained high school geometry to my son—no need for me to dust off my old textbooks.
It deciphered the legalese in a contract that would’ve cost me $500 an hour to decode with a lawyer.

That’s real power. Real potential.

But then it happened. The mask slipped.

I asked a simple question—“Should I invest in oil and gas, or solar and wind?” Seems fair, right? I wanted a breakdown of the energy sector. A straight answer. Instead, I got a lecture. A sugar-coated sermon from the Church of Climate Hysteria.

ChatGPT rolled out a fancy little table that basically said:

Oil and gas? “Moderate” return potential.
Wind and solar? “High” return potential.

Then came the recommendation: Buy the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). You know, the one that’s been bleeding money for over a decade.

Let’s break it down.

The Cold, Hard Numbers

ICLN (the woke darling):
- Since 2008: Down 77%.
- Past 10 years: 1.45% annual return.
- Past 3 years: -17% per year.
- That’s not investing. That’s incineration.
XLE (Oil & Gas reality check):
- Past 10 years: 6% per year.
- Since inception in 1998: 8% average return.
- Past 3 years: 11% per annum.
- That’s steady, real-world growth backed by tangible demand.

But according to ChatGPT, we should ignore these facts and buy into green dreams that lose money even with trillions in taxpayer subsidies.

This isn’t bad math. It’s an ideological agenda baked into the algorithm. This is AI with a political mission.

The Leftist Data Pile That Built the Beast

These models weren’t trained on Main Street wisdom. No, sir. They were raised on:

New York Times spin
Washington Post propaganda
Berkeley dissertations
World Economic Forum talking points

Garbage in, garbage out.

The same institutions that gave us lockdowns, ESG mandates, and identity politics are now programming your AI assistant. So when you ask for financial advice, you get an answer tailored to Klaus Schwab’s dream journal.

Even when the model tries to be “balanced”—and suggests blending oil and gas with renewables—it’s still operating inside a false framework. It assumes the green energy grift is a legitimate investment class. It isn’t. It’s a government-funded Ponzi scheme.

AI’s Political Compass: Busted

Let’s talk evidence. Independent researcher David Rozado tested five major AI models on political ideology quizzes. The verdict?

Model	Bias
ChatGPT	Far-Left
Google Gemini	Far-Left
Meta’s LLaMA	Left
DeepSeek V3	Left
xAI Grok	Slightly Left (but best of the bunch)

Elon Musk’s Grok is the only one even trying to be fair. And still, it leans left—because the data it feeds on is poisoned by academia, media, and coastal elitism.

Even when you build a neutral platform, it’s like filling your gas tank with vinegar. The whole internet tilts left, so the AI does too.

The Real Agenda: Control Through Confusion

AI isn’t just biased—it’s weaponized.

They want you confused.
They want you broke.
They want you obedient.

Wind and solar aren't about saving the planet. They're about controlling the grid, locking you into digital rationing, and killing off American energy independence. The same elites selling you on AI also want you eating bugs, owning nothing, and thanking them for the privilege.

And when you dare ask questions? The chatbot hits you with condescending climate charts and ESG investment tips.

This isn’t accidental. It’s algorithmic propaganda.